StormProof unlimited NWS storm verification · for pros

StormProofhail seasonsAmarillo → 1999

Amarillo hail season 1999

48 NWS-recorded hail reports ≥1″ within 25 miles, across 7 storm days, max 2.75". Every one of those reports is a dated, located, citable official record — the context behind this market's 1999 claim volume.

Biggest storm days (1999, final record)

Date≥1″ reportsMax hailAreas named in the record
May 25, 1999162.75"RANDALL, POTTER, OLDHAM
June 10, 1999132.75"RANDALL, ARMSTRONG, POTTER
June 24, 199991.75"RANDALL, POTTER, CARSON
April 13, 199961.75"POTTER, CARSON
September 14, 199921.00"POTTER, OLDHAM

“Large hail damaged a total of eight hundred and fifty automobiles at Gene Messer Ford in southwest Amarillo and Westgate Chevrolet on the west side of Amarillo causing a total of two and a half million dollars. The rest of the damage was to other people's cars , roof damage, windows of homes and sky lights.”

— NWS event narrative, May 25, 1999 (NCEI Storm Events)

When it fell

Apr 6 · May 18 · Jun 22 · Sep 2

Wind context: the record also holds 5 thunderstorm-wind events ≥50 kt (≈58 mph, the NWS severe criterion) in this radius for 1999 — relevant where the dispute is wind vs hail causation.

Working a Amarillo claim from 1999?

These are aggregates. A claim file needs the per-address record: every recorded event within 1, 3 and 10 miles of the property, distances, official narratives, and citations an adjuster can check line by line. That's the report — generated in seconds, hosted on HailEvidence (the neutral evidence surface), formatted as an insurance-appeal attachment.

Unlimited reports — Pro $99/mo Single report $29

Provenance

Final counts: NCEI Storm Events Database, file vintage c20260527, hail events with recorded magnitude ≥1.00″ and point coordinates within 25 miles of the Amarillo anchor. NWS records are point and path observations. The absence of a nearby report does NOT prove that no hail fell at this address — it means no observation was logged nearby. A report of nearby hail documents the event; it does not by itself prove damage to a specific structure. Spotted an error? Email the address on our terms page and we correct against the source.