StormProof → hail seasons → Amarillo → 2005
Amarillo hail season 2005
53 NWS-recorded hail reports ≥1″ within 25 miles, across 10 storm days, max 2.75". Every one of those reports is a dated, located, citable official record — the context behind this market's 2005 claim volume.
Biggest storm days (2005, final record)
| Date | ≥1″ reports | Max hail | Areas named in the record |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2005 | 18 | 2.75" | RANDALL, POTTER |
| June 11, 2005 | 12 | 2.50" | POTTER, DEAF SMITH, ARMSTRONG, RANDALL |
| June 10, 2005 | 7 | 1.75" | POTTER, OLDHAM |
| May 31, 2005 | 5 | 1.75" | RANDALL, POTTER |
| April 17, 2005 | 4 | 1.50" | RANDALL, POTTER |
“A few skylights in southwest Amarillo were broken due to the large hail.”
— NWS event narrative, May 12, 2005 (NCEI Storm Events)
When it fell
Feb 1 · Apr 5 · May 25 · Jun 21 · Aug 1
Wind context: the record also holds 11 thunderstorm-wind events ≥50 kt (≈58 mph, the NWS severe criterion) in this radius for 2005 — relevant where the dispute is wind vs hail causation.
Working a Amarillo claim from 2005?
These are aggregates. A claim file needs the per-address record: every recorded event within 1, 3 and 10 miles of the property, distances, official narratives, and citations an adjuster can check line by line. That's the report — generated in seconds, hosted on HailEvidence (the neutral evidence surface), formatted as an insurance-appeal attachment.
Unlimited reports — Pro $99/mo Single report $29
Provenance
Final counts: NCEI Storm Events Database, file vintage c20260527, hail events with recorded magnitude ≥1.00″ and point coordinates within 25 miles of the Amarillo anchor. NWS records are point and path observations. The absence of a nearby report does NOT prove that no hail fell at this address — it means no observation was logged nearby. A report of nearby hail documents the event; it does not by itself prove damage to a specific structure. Spotted an error? Email the address on our terms page and we correct against the source.