StormProof unlimited NWS storm verification · for pros

StormProofhail seasonsCharlotte → 2011

Charlotte hail season 2011

70 NWS-recorded hail reports ≥1″ within 35 miles, across 17 storm days, max 4.00". Every one of those reports is a dated, located, citable official record — the context behind this market's 2011 claim volume.

Biggest storm days (2011, final record)

Date≥1″ reportsMax hailAreas named in the record
April 9, 2011364.00"LANCASTER, CHESTER, UNION, YORK
April 5, 201151.25"CLEVELAND, GASTON, MECKLENBURG
May 10, 201142.00"GASTON, MECKLENBURG, IREDELL
August 11, 201131.25"MECKLENBURG, GASTON
June 9, 201131.25"MECKLENBURG, ROWAN

“Lancaster EMA reported 3 separate episodes of hail. Golfball size hail occurred from 615-630pm, 1.5-2 inch hail occurred from 710-720pm. Pea to marble size hail occurred between 730-740pm. Hail covered the ground and there was one tree knocked down by a wind gust.”

— NWS event narrative, April 9, 2011 (NCEI Storm Events)

When it fell

Apr 41 · May 8 · Jun 13 · Jul 2 · Aug 4 · Sep 2

Wind context: the record also holds 163 thunderstorm-wind events ≥50 kt (≈58 mph, the NWS severe criterion) in this radius for 2011 — relevant where the dispute is wind vs hail causation.

Working a Charlotte claim from 2011?

These are aggregates. A claim file needs the per-address record: every recorded event within 1, 3 and 10 miles of the property, distances, official narratives, and citations an adjuster can check line by line. That's the report — generated in seconds, hosted on HailEvidence (the neutral evidence surface), formatted as an insurance-appeal attachment.

Unlimited reports — Pro $99/mo Single report $29

Provenance

Final counts: NCEI Storm Events Database, file vintage c20260527, hail events with recorded magnitude ≥1.00″ and point coordinates within 35 miles of the Charlotte anchor. NWS records are point and path observations. The absence of a nearby report does NOT prove that no hail fell at this address — it means no observation was logged nearby. A report of nearby hail documents the event; it does not by itself prove damage to a specific structure. Spotted an error? Email the address on our terms page and we correct against the source.