StormProof unlimited NWS storm verification · for pros

StormProofhail seasonsGreensboro–Winston-Salem → 2015

Greensboro–Winston-Salem hail season 2015

10 NWS-recorded hail reports ≥1″ within 30 miles, across 4 storm days, max 1.25". Every one of those reports is a dated, located, citable official record — the context behind this market's 2015 claim volume.

Biggest storm days (2015, final record)

Date≥1″ reportsMax hailAreas named in the record
April 20, 201561.25"RANDOLPH, FORSYTH, GUILFORD, ROCKINGHAM
September 4, 201521.00"DAVIDSON, STOKES
July 13, 201511.25"RANDOLPH
June 26, 201511.00"RANDOLPH

“Hail the size of quarters to half dollars was reported along a swath from several miles southwest of Winston Salem to a couple miles northwest of Sedge Garden.”

— NWS event narrative, April 20, 2015 (NCEI Storm Events)

When it fell

Apr 6 · Jun 1 · Jul 1 · Sep 2

Wind context: the record also holds 63 thunderstorm-wind events ≥50 kt (≈58 mph, the NWS severe criterion) in this radius for 2015 — relevant where the dispute is wind vs hail causation.

Working a Greensboro–Winston-Salem claim from 2015?

These are aggregates. A claim file needs the per-address record: every recorded event within 1, 3 and 10 miles of the property, distances, official narratives, and citations an adjuster can check line by line. That's the report — generated in seconds, hosted on HailEvidence (the neutral evidence surface), formatted as an insurance-appeal attachment.

Unlimited reports — Pro $99/mo Single report $29

Provenance

Final counts: NCEI Storm Events Database, file vintage c20260527, hail events with recorded magnitude ≥1.00″ and point coordinates within 30 miles of the Greensboro–Winston-Salem anchor. NWS records are point and path observations. The absence of a nearby report does NOT prove that no hail fell at this address — it means no observation was logged nearby. A report of nearby hail documents the event; it does not by itself prove damage to a specific structure. Spotted an error? Email the address on our terms page and we correct against the source.