StormProof → hail seasons → Jackson (MS) → 2005
Jackson (MS) hail season 2005
20 NWS-recorded hail reports ≥1″ within 25 miles, across 6 storm days, max 2.50". Every one of those reports is a dated, located, citable official record — the context behind this market's 2005 claim volume.
Biggest storm days (2005, final record)
| Date | ≥1″ reports | Max hail | Areas named in the record |
|---|---|---|---|
| March 13, 2005 | 6 | 1.75" | LOWNDES, JASPER, RANKIN, SCOTT |
| April 22, 2005 | 5 | 1.75" | YAZOO, NESHOBA, LAUDERDALE, ATTALA |
| April 6, 2005 | 4 | 1.00" | LAWRENCE, RANKIN, WARREN |
| April 11, 2005 | 3 | 1.00" | HINDS, MADISON |
| March 31, 2005 | 1 | 1.75" | LAWRENCE |
“Sunday evening, a supercell thunderstorm moved across the southern portion of Scott county and produced a swath of hail from quarter to golf ball sized. Near the Homewood community, golf ball sized hail damaged some homes and punched holes in siding.”
— NWS event narrative, March 13, 2005 (NCEI Storm Events)
When it fell
Mar 8 · Apr 12
Wind context: the record also holds 58 thunderstorm-wind events ≥50 kt (≈58 mph, the NWS severe criterion) in this radius for 2005 — relevant where the dispute is wind vs hail causation.
Working a Jackson (MS) claim from 2005?
These are aggregates. A claim file needs the per-address record: every recorded event within 1, 3 and 10 miles of the property, distances, official narratives, and citations an adjuster can check line by line. That's the report — generated in seconds, hosted on HailEvidence (the neutral evidence surface), formatted as an insurance-appeal attachment.
Unlimited reports — Pro $99/mo Single report $29
Provenance
Final counts: NCEI Storm Events Database, file vintage c20260527, hail events with recorded magnitude ≥1.00″ and point coordinates within 25 miles of the Jackson (MS) anchor. NWS records are point and path observations. The absence of a nearby report does NOT prove that no hail fell at this address — it means no observation was logged nearby. A report of nearby hail documents the event; it does not by itself prove damage to a specific structure. Spotted an error? Email the address on our terms page and we correct against the source.