StormProof → hail seasons → Lubbock → 2025
Lubbock hail season 2025
30 NWS-recorded hail reports ≥1″ within 25 miles, across 13 storm days, max 5.00". Every one of those reports is a dated, located, citable official record — the context behind this market's 2025 claim volume.
Biggest storm days (2025, final record)
| Date | ≥1″ reports | Max hail | Areas named in the record |
|---|---|---|---|
| June 6, 2025 | 10 | 3.25" | LYNN, LUBBOCK, HOCKLEY, CROSBY |
| June 5, 2025 | 4 | 5.00" | LUBBOCK, HOCKLEY |
| June 17, 2025 | 3 | 1.75" | LYNN, LUBBOCK |
| June 8, 2025 | 2 | 1.75" | LUBBOCK, CROSBY |
| April 27, 2025 | 2 | 1.50" | LUBBOCK |
“A cluster of thunderstorms over central Lubbock County produced three separate swaths of hail. Several public reports were received from mPing and from a contract weather observer at Lubbock Inattentional Airport of hail ranging in size from pennies to two inches in diameter.”
— NWS event narrative, June 6, 2025 (NCEI Storm Events)
When it fell
Apr 8 · May 2 · Jun 19 · Jul 1
Wind context: the record also holds 35 thunderstorm-wind events ≥50 kt (≈58 mph, the NWS severe criterion) in this radius for 2025 — relevant where the dispute is wind vs hail causation.
Working a Lubbock claim from 2025?
These are aggregates. A claim file needs the per-address record: every recorded event within 1, 3 and 10 miles of the property, distances, official narratives, and citations an adjuster can check line by line. That's the report — generated in seconds, hosted on HailEvidence (the neutral evidence surface), formatted as an insurance-appeal attachment.
Unlimited reports — Pro $99/mo Single report $29
Provenance
Final counts: NCEI Storm Events Database, file vintage c20260527, hail events with recorded magnitude ≥1.00″ and point coordinates within 25 miles of the Lubbock anchor. NWS records are point and path observations. The absence of a nearby report does NOT prove that no hail fell at this address — it means no observation was logged nearby. A report of nearby hail documents the event; it does not by itself prove damage to a specific structure. Spotted an error? Email the address on our terms page and we correct against the source.