StormProof → hail seasons → Midland–Odessa → 2002
Midland–Odessa hail season 2002
17 NWS-recorded hail reports ≥1″ within 25 miles, across 8 storm days, max 1.75". Every one of those reports is a dated, located, citable official record — the context behind this market's 2002 claim volume.
Biggest storm days (2002, final record)
| Date | ≥1″ reports | Max hail | Areas named in the record |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2002 | 7 | 1.75" | GLASSCOCK, MIDLAND, ECTOR, ANDREWS |
| May 7, 2002 | 3 | 1.00" | MIDLAND |
| August 13, 2002 | 2 | 1.75" | MIDLAND |
| September 14, 2002 | 1 | 1.25" | ECTOR |
| May 4, 2002 | 1 | 1.75" | MARTIN |
“Pea to quarter size hail was reported at the intersection of Andrews Highway and Midland Drive in the city of Midland.”
— NWS event narrative, May 27, 2002 (NCEI Storm Events)
When it fell
Mar 1 · Apr 2 · May 11 · Aug 2 · Sep 1
Wind context: the record also holds 24 thunderstorm-wind events ≥50 kt (≈58 mph, the NWS severe criterion) in this radius for 2002 — relevant where the dispute is wind vs hail causation.
Working a Midland–Odessa claim from 2002?
These are aggregates. A claim file needs the per-address record: every recorded event within 1, 3 and 10 miles of the property, distances, official narratives, and citations an adjuster can check line by line. That's the report — generated in seconds, hosted on HailEvidence (the neutral evidence surface), formatted as an insurance-appeal attachment.
Unlimited reports — Pro $99/mo Single report $29
Provenance
Final counts: NCEI Storm Events Database, file vintage c20260527, hail events with recorded magnitude ≥1.00″ and point coordinates within 25 miles of the Midland–Odessa anchor. NWS records are point and path observations. The absence of a nearby report does NOT prove that no hail fell at this address — it means no observation was logged nearby. A report of nearby hail documents the event; it does not by itself prove damage to a specific structure. Spotted an error? Email the address on our terms page and we correct against the source.