StormProof → hail seasons → Minneapolis–St. Paul → 2005
Minneapolis–St. Paul hail season 2005
49 NWS-recorded hail reports ≥1″ within 35 miles, across 13 storm days, max 2.00". Every one of those reports is a dated, located, citable official record — the context behind this market's 2005 claim volume.
Biggest storm days (2005, final record)
| Date | ≥1″ reports | Max hail | Areas named in the record |
|---|---|---|---|
| September 21, 2005 | 16 | 2.00" | HENNEPIN, ANOKA, STEARNS, WRIGHT |
| June 13, 2005 | 7 | 1.25" | SCOTT, WASHINGTON, HENNEPIN, RAMSEY |
| September 4, 2005 | 5 | 2.00" | ANOKA, CARVER, HENNEPIN, WRIGHT |
| September 3, 2005 | 5 | 1.75" | MEEKER, STEARNS |
| June 27, 2005 | 3 | 1.00" | HENNEPIN, ANOKA |
“An RV dealershp saw all 140 vehicles damaged by hail, including 12 that were totaled. Hail larger than golf balls went through grills and dented radiators.”
— NWS event narrative, September 21, 2005 (NCEI Storm Events)
When it fell
Jun 18 · Jul 1 · Aug 2 · Sep 28
Wind context: the record also holds 142 thunderstorm-wind events ≥50 kt (≈58 mph, the NWS severe criterion) in this radius for 2005 — relevant where the dispute is wind vs hail causation.
Working a Minneapolis–St. Paul claim from 2005?
These are aggregates. A claim file needs the per-address record: every recorded event within 1, 3 and 10 miles of the property, distances, official narratives, and citations an adjuster can check line by line. That's the report — generated in seconds, hosted on HailEvidence (the neutral evidence surface), formatted as an insurance-appeal attachment.
Unlimited reports — Pro $99/mo Single report $29
Provenance
Final counts: NCEI Storm Events Database, file vintage c20260527, hail events with recorded magnitude ≥1.00″ and point coordinates within 35 miles of the Minneapolis–St. Paul anchor. NWS records are point and path observations. The absence of a nearby report does NOT prove that no hail fell at this address — it means no observation was logged nearby. A report of nearby hail documents the event; it does not by itself prove damage to a specific structure. Spotted an error? Email the address on our terms page and we correct against the source.