StormProof unlimited NWS storm verification · for pros

StormProofhail seasonsOmaha → 2010

Omaha hail season 2010

31 NWS-recorded hail reports ≥1″ within 30 miles, across 12 storm days, max 3.00". Every one of those reports is a dated, located, citable official record — the context behind this market's 2010 claim volume.

Biggest storm days (2010, final record)

Date≥1″ reportsMax hailAreas named in the record
June 1, 201091.75"SARPY, DOUGLAS, DODGE, WASHINGTON
August 31, 201041.75"DOUGLAS
September 13, 201032.50"SAUNDERS
August 3, 201033.00"SARPY, DOUGLAS, POTTAWATTAMIE
May 12, 201031.00"SARPY, DOUGLAS

“Hail of 1 inch to half dollar-size in diameter was reported from west Omaha into the western sections of midtown near 108th and Grover and 108th and I Streets. The half dollar-size hail was reported near 180th and Q Streets and north of 144th and Center. The hail caused some car and plant damage.”

— NWS event narrative, June 1, 2010 (NCEI Storm Events)

When it fell

Apr 4 · May 3 · Jun 11 · Aug 8 · Sep 5

Wind context: the record also holds 56 thunderstorm-wind events ≥50 kt (≈58 mph, the NWS severe criterion) in this radius for 2010 — relevant where the dispute is wind vs hail causation.

Working a Omaha claim from 2010?

These are aggregates. A claim file needs the per-address record: every recorded event within 1, 3 and 10 miles of the property, distances, official narratives, and citations an adjuster can check line by line. That's the report — generated in seconds, hosted on HailEvidence (the neutral evidence surface), formatted as an insurance-appeal attachment.

Unlimited reports — Pro $99/mo Single report $29

Provenance

Final counts: NCEI Storm Events Database, file vintage c20260527, hail events with recorded magnitude ≥1.00″ and point coordinates within 30 miles of the Omaha anchor. NWS records are point and path observations. The absence of a nearby report does NOT prove that no hail fell at this address — it means no observation was logged nearby. A report of nearby hail documents the event; it does not by itself prove damage to a specific structure. Spotted an error? Email the address on our terms page and we correct against the source.