StormProof → hail seasons → Raleigh–Durham → 2000
Raleigh–Durham hail season 2000
9 NWS-recorded hail reports ≥1″ within 30 miles, across 6 storm days, max 1.75". Every one of those reports is a dated, located, citable official record — the context behind this market's 2000 claim volume.
Biggest storm days (2000, final record)
| Date | ≥1″ reports | Max hail | Areas named in the record |
|---|---|---|---|
| June 3, 2000 | 3 | 1.75" | HARNETT, WAKE |
| April 29, 2000 | 2 | 1.75" | WAKE, DURHAM |
| December 17, 2000 | 1 | 1.50" | JOHNSTON |
| July 17, 2000 | 1 | 1.00" | WAKE |
| May 28, 2000 | 1 | 1.00" | WAKE |
“Dime to quarter size hail was reported throughout the county.”
— NWS event narrative, June 3, 2000 (NCEI Storm Events)
When it fell
Apr 3 · May 1 · Jun 3 · Jul 1 · Dec 1
Wind context: the record also holds 41 thunderstorm-wind events ≥50 kt (≈58 mph, the NWS severe criterion) in this radius for 2000 — relevant where the dispute is wind vs hail causation.
Working a Raleigh–Durham claim from 2000?
These are aggregates. A claim file needs the per-address record: every recorded event within 1, 3 and 10 miles of the property, distances, official narratives, and citations an adjuster can check line by line. That's the report — generated in seconds, hosted on HailEvidence (the neutral evidence surface), formatted as an insurance-appeal attachment.
Unlimited reports — Pro $99/mo Single report $29
Provenance
Final counts: NCEI Storm Events Database, file vintage c20260527, hail events with recorded magnitude ≥1.00″ and point coordinates within 30 miles of the Raleigh–Durham anchor. NWS records are point and path observations. The absence of a nearby report does NOT prove that no hail fell at this address — it means no observation was logged nearby. A report of nearby hail documents the event; it does not by itself prove damage to a specific structure. Spotted an error? Email the address on our terms page and we correct against the source.