StormProof → hail seasons → Raleigh–Durham → 2006
Raleigh–Durham hail season 2006
36 NWS-recorded hail reports ≥1″ within 30 miles, across 8 storm days, max 1.75". Every one of those reports is a dated, located, citable official record — the context behind this market's 2006 claim volume.
Biggest storm days (2006, final record)
| Date | ≥1″ reports | Max hail | Areas named in the record |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2006 | 20 | 1.75" | WAKE, DURHAM, GRANVILLE |
| May 20, 2006 | 7 | 1.75" | HARNETT, JOHNSTON, WAKE |
| May 26, 2006 | 2 | 1.75" | JOHNSTON |
| May 25, 2006 | 2 | 1.00" | WAKE, ORANGE |
| April 22, 2006 | 2 | 1.75" | WAKE |
“REPORTED AT THE INTERSECTION OF STONEY HILL ROAD AND BUD MORRIS ROAD.”
— NWS event narrative, May 14, 2006 (NCEI Storm Events)
When it fell
Apr 3 · May 31 · Jun 1 · Jul 1
Wind context: the record also holds 100 thunderstorm-wind events ≥50 kt (≈58 mph, the NWS severe criterion) in this radius for 2006 — relevant where the dispute is wind vs hail causation.
Working a Raleigh–Durham claim from 2006?
These are aggregates. A claim file needs the per-address record: every recorded event within 1, 3 and 10 miles of the property, distances, official narratives, and citations an adjuster can check line by line. That's the report — generated in seconds, hosted on HailEvidence (the neutral evidence surface), formatted as an insurance-appeal attachment.
Unlimited reports — Pro $99/mo Single report $29
Provenance
Final counts: NCEI Storm Events Database, file vintage c20260527, hail events with recorded magnitude ≥1.00″ and point coordinates within 30 miles of the Raleigh–Durham anchor. NWS records are point and path observations. The absence of a nearby report does NOT prove that no hail fell at this address — it means no observation was logged nearby. A report of nearby hail documents the event; it does not by itself prove damage to a specific structure. Spotted an error? Email the address on our terms page and we correct against the source.