StormProof → hail seasons → Richmond → 2012
Richmond hail season 2012
11 NWS-recorded hail reports ≥1″ within 25 miles, across 5 storm days, max 1.75". Every one of those reports is a dated, located, citable official record — the context behind this market's 2012 claim volume.
Biggest storm days (2012, final record)
| Date | ≥1″ reports | Max hail | Areas named in the record |
|---|---|---|---|
| February 24, 2012 | 4 | 1.75" | CHESTERFIELD, HENRICO |
| June 30, 2012 | 3 | 1.75" | PRINCE GEORGE, HOPEWELL (C), CHESTERFIELD |
| June 25, 2012 | 2 | 1.00" | HENRICO, HANOVER |
| August 2, 2012 | 1 | 1.00" | ACCOMACK |
| June 1, 2012 | 1 | 1.25" | NELSON |
“Golf ball size hail was reported at Chippenham Parkway and Route 10.”
— NWS event narrative, February 24, 2012 (NCEI Storm Events)
When it fell
Feb 4 · Jun 6 · Aug 1
Wind context: the record also holds 59 thunderstorm-wind events ≥50 kt (≈58 mph, the NWS severe criterion) in this radius for 2012 — relevant where the dispute is wind vs hail causation.
Working a Richmond claim from 2012?
These are aggregates. A claim file needs the per-address record: every recorded event within 1, 3 and 10 miles of the property, distances, official narratives, and citations an adjuster can check line by line. That's the report — generated in seconds, hosted on HailEvidence (the neutral evidence surface), formatted as an insurance-appeal attachment.
Unlimited reports — Pro $99/mo Single report $29
Provenance
Final counts: NCEI Storm Events Database, file vintage c20260527, hail events with recorded magnitude ≥1.00″ and point coordinates within 25 miles of the Richmond anchor. NWS records are point and path observations. The absence of a nearby report does NOT prove that no hail fell at this address — it means no observation was logged nearby. A report of nearby hail documents the event; it does not by itself prove damage to a specific structure. Spotted an error? Email the address on our terms page and we correct against the source.