StormProof unlimited NWS storm verification · for pros

StormProofhail seasonsSpringfield (MO) → 2012

Springfield (MO) hail season 2012

18 NWS-recorded hail reports ≥1″ within 25 miles, across 7 storm days, max 1.75". Every one of those reports is a dated, located, citable official record — the context behind this market's 2012 claim volume.

Biggest storm days (2012, final record)

Date≥1″ reportsMax hailAreas named in the record
August 16, 201261.75"GREENE, WEBSTER
September 26, 201241.75"CHRISTIAN, STONE
September 21, 201231.00"GREENE
June 11, 201221.00"CHRISTIAN, GREENE
October 12, 201211.00"GREENE

“Mostly dime sized hail with a few up to the size of quarters were reported. NWS employee automated backyard AcuRite weather station reported a 46 mph wind gust and nearly 2 inches of rainfall in one hour. Minor street flooding was reported due to the heavy rainfall.”

— NWS event narrative, August 16, 2012 (NCEI Storm Events)

When it fell

Apr 1 · May 1 · Jun 2 · Aug 6 · Sep 7 · Oct 1

Wind context: the record also holds 106 thunderstorm-wind events ≥50 kt (≈58 mph, the NWS severe criterion) in this radius for 2012 — relevant where the dispute is wind vs hail causation.

Working a Springfield (MO) claim from 2012?

These are aggregates. A claim file needs the per-address record: every recorded event within 1, 3 and 10 miles of the property, distances, official narratives, and citations an adjuster can check line by line. That's the report — generated in seconds, hosted on HailEvidence (the neutral evidence surface), formatted as an insurance-appeal attachment.

Unlimited reports — Pro $99/mo Single report $29

Provenance

Final counts: NCEI Storm Events Database, file vintage c20260527, hail events with recorded magnitude ≥1.00″ and point coordinates within 25 miles of the Springfield (MO) anchor. NWS records are point and path observations. The absence of a nearby report does NOT prove that no hail fell at this address — it means no observation was logged nearby. A report of nearby hail documents the event; it does not by itself prove damage to a specific structure. Spotted an error? Email the address on our terms page and we correct against the source.