StormProof unlimited NWS storm verification · for pros

StormProofhail seasonsTulsa → 2003

Tulsa hail season 2003

14 NWS-recorded hail reports ≥1″ within 30 miles, across 5 storm days, max 2.75". Every one of those reports is a dated, located, citable official record — the context behind this market's 2003 claim volume.

Biggest storm days (2003, final record)

Date≥1″ reportsMax hailAreas named in the record
November 18, 200362.75"OKMULGEE, TULSA, CREEK, ROGERS
May 10, 200342.75"CREEK, TULSA, SEQUOYAH
May 19, 200321.00"OSAGE, TULSA
June 14, 200311.00"TULSA
May 13, 200311.25"OSAGE

“Baseball hail was reported at 31st and Harvard and then again at 21st and Harvard. The hail broke windows and damaged numerous roofs of buildings and cars. Damage is estimated; pending supplemental insurance reports.”

— NWS event narrative, November 18, 2003 (NCEI Storm Events)

When it fell

May 7 · Jun 1 · Nov 6

Wind context: the record also holds 65 thunderstorm-wind events ≥50 kt (≈58 mph, the NWS severe criterion) in this radius for 2003 — relevant where the dispute is wind vs hail causation.

Working a Tulsa claim from 2003?

These are aggregates. A claim file needs the per-address record: every recorded event within 1, 3 and 10 miles of the property, distances, official narratives, and citations an adjuster can check line by line. That's the report — generated in seconds, hosted on HailEvidence (the neutral evidence surface), formatted as an insurance-appeal attachment.

Unlimited reports — Pro $99/mo Single report $29

Provenance

Final counts: NCEI Storm Events Database, file vintage c20260527, hail events with recorded magnitude ≥1.00″ and point coordinates within 30 miles of the Tulsa anchor. NWS records are point and path observations. The absence of a nearby report does NOT prove that no hail fell at this address — it means no observation was logged nearby. A report of nearby hail documents the event; it does not by itself prove damage to a specific structure. Spotted an error? Email the address on our terms page and we correct against the source.