StormProof unlimited NWS storm verification · for pros

StormProofhail seasonsAtlanta → 1997

Atlanta hail season 1997

62 NWS-recorded hail reports ≥1″ within 45 miles, across 15 storm days, max 4.00". Every one of those reports is a dated, located, citable official record — the context behind this market's 1997 claim volume.

Biggest storm days (1997, final record)

Date≥1″ reportsMax hailAreas named in the record
September 10, 1997151.75"COWETA, FAYETTE, WALTON, DOUGLAS
April 22, 1997124.00"WALTON, COBB, GWINNETT, PAULDING
April 28, 1997102.50"CARROLL, DOUGLAS, FULTON, DE KALB
July 28, 199771.25"HENRY, NEWTON, WALTON
October 25, 199731.00"MERIWETHER, COWETA, FORSYTH

“A Weather Channel employee reported golfball sized hail in the Dunwoody area along and on the Fulton - De Kalb counties line. Another report from the public was of half-dollar sized hail in the same area.”

— NWS event narrative, September 10, 1997 (NCEI Storm Events)

When it fell

Jan 1 · Apr 23 · May 4 · Jun 4 · Jul 11 · Sep 15 · Oct 3 · Nov 1

Wind context: the record also holds 18 thunderstorm-wind events ≥50 kt (≈58 mph, the NWS severe criterion) in this radius for 1997 — relevant where the dispute is wind vs hail causation.

Working a Atlanta claim from 1997?

These are aggregates. A claim file needs the per-address record: every recorded event within 1, 3 and 10 miles of the property, distances, official narratives, and citations an adjuster can check line by line. That's the report — generated in seconds, hosted on HailEvidence (the neutral evidence surface), formatted as an insurance-appeal attachment.

Unlimited reports — Pro $99/mo Single report $29

Provenance

Final counts: NCEI Storm Events Database, file vintage c20260527, hail events with recorded magnitude ≥1.00″ and point coordinates within 45 miles of the Atlanta anchor. NWS records are point and path observations. The absence of a nearby report does NOT prove that no hail fell at this address — it means no observation was logged nearby. A report of nearby hail documents the event; it does not by itself prove damage to a specific structure. Spotted an error? Email the address on our terms page and we correct against the source.