StormProof unlimited NWS storm verification · for pros

StormProofhail seasonsColumbia (SC) → 2012

Columbia (SC) hail season 2012

33 NWS-recorded hail reports ≥1″ within 25 miles, across 9 storm days, max 2.00". Every one of those reports is a dated, located, citable official record — the context behind this market's 2012 claim volume.

Biggest storm days (2012, final record)

Date≥1″ reportsMax hailAreas named in the record
July 1, 2012152.00"LEXINGTON, RICHLAND, FAIRFIELD
March 24, 201251.25"RICHLAND, SUMTER, LEXINGTON
August 2, 201241.00"LEXINGTON, RICHLAND
May 15, 201241.75"CALHOUN, LEXINGTON
November 4, 201211.00"LEXINGTON

“Numerous reports of 1 inch hail on Roland Drive, Emmanual Church Road, Longs Pond Road near I-20, and Lexington Hills Subdivision.”

— NWS event narrative, July 1, 2012 (NCEI Storm Events)

When it fell

Feb 1 · Mar 6 · May 5 · Jun 1 · Jul 15 · Aug 4 · Nov 1

Wind context: the record also holds 65 thunderstorm-wind events ≥50 kt (≈58 mph, the NWS severe criterion) in this radius for 2012 — relevant where the dispute is wind vs hail causation.

Working a Columbia (SC) claim from 2012?

These are aggregates. A claim file needs the per-address record: every recorded event within 1, 3 and 10 miles of the property, distances, official narratives, and citations an adjuster can check line by line. That's the report — generated in seconds, hosted on HailEvidence (the neutral evidence surface), formatted as an insurance-appeal attachment.

Unlimited reports — Pro $99/mo Single report $29

Provenance

Final counts: NCEI Storm Events Database, file vintage c20260527, hail events with recorded magnitude ≥1.00″ and point coordinates within 25 miles of the Columbia (SC) anchor. NWS records are point and path observations. The absence of a nearby report does NOT prove that no hail fell at this address — it means no observation was logged nearby. A report of nearby hail documents the event; it does not by itself prove damage to a specific structure. Spotted an error? Email the address on our terms page and we correct against the source.